Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 00:27

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is the best way to get over your ex?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
What melts your heart every time without fail?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why is that Hag Hillary Clinton so quiet these days? She is the dog that isn't barking
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Breast transplanted to replace cancerous one in 'world first' operation - BBC